weirdr.net is a Fediverse instance that uses the ActivityPub protocol. In other words, users at this host can communicate with people that use software like Mastodon, Pleroma, Friendica, etc. all around the world.

This server runs the snac software and there is no automatic sign-up process.

Site description
This is a dual Pentium Pro running NetBSD.
Check out the floppy museum for hints on how to get in touch. Or, you know, ping me on the fediverse. :)
Admin account
@ltning@weirdr.net

Recent posts by users in this instance

0 ★ 0 ↺

[?]Ltning »
@ltning@weirdr.net

Hey there :) Trust me, I know testing ISA cards in PCI machines is "wrong". And that there are many reasons for this, but the bridges you mention are not, in themselves, the problem. I'd like to say "not all bridges are created alike", and also that the direct cpu-to-ISA thing has not been true since the 286 era. From anything 386 onwards there has always been a bridge of some kind involved. So yes, it's "wrong", but only in the sense that "there's a PCI bus here, wtf am I punishing myself with an ISA VGA?!?".

ISA performance can be "as good as it gets" on a PCI machine, and most BIOSes will allow you to configure it to a point that it can easily saturate the bus and even break stuff - just like in the good old days. Wait states and bus speed tuning being the most important things.

I also know that Tridents are not all garbage, but it is fair to say that the 9000-series (which is essentially a 8900C with some additional integration) isn't going to win any performance prizes no matter what machine you put it in. The 8900D on the other hand is quite impressive in DOS, keeping up with all but a small handful of much more expensive cards. It is, of course, useless for a GUI system since it has no acceleration functions, but for plain VGA it's pretty good.


All that said, I have not made any attempt at tuning for speed in these tests, and as I'm sure came across in my post - this is a highly un-scientific test that is only meant to gauge the relative difference between those cards (and with room for failure even at that). Fact of the matter, and what I wanted to confirm, is that the Matrox is unbelievably slow; I'm fairly sure the original VGA implementation with discrete chips (rather than a "VGA chip") would've performed better. Hell, even UniVBE warns me when configuring it that the card is unbearably slow in DOS, and doesn't even expose more than 1MB in VGA mode, so I should not expect much from it. Well, I guess I confirmed that, at least. :D

The reason is, of course, that the Matrox is made for GUI applications. And in those, compared to its peers, it absolutely shines according to reviews at the time. I'm looking forward to testing it in a GUI environment, and I'll surely post about that somewhere as well. And I'll use more period-correct hardware, I promise! :)

    5 ★ 1 ↺

    [?]Ltning »
    @ltning@weirdr.net

    Welcome to my mini ISA VGA shootout!
    TL;DR: ISA Matrox cards are really, really slow in DOS.

    I recently built an original Pentium 60MHz system, built on an ECS motherboard. Around the same time I received a "mystery" VGA card: A Matrox MGA Impression ISA card. And since most of my builds are "open builds" and therefore easily accessible, that machine got the pleasure of becoming the test bench for the Matrox.

    As already revealed, the Matrox performs atrociously bad. So bad, in fact, that I had to test a couple other ISA cards to make sure it wasn't a system issue. I used my go-to benchmarking tool from Phil's DOS Benchmark Pack. I really don't want to experience Doom with this card..

    And without further ado, the contestants and their results in this spur-of-the-moment benchmark run:
    - Baseline: A 32-bit PCI S3 Virge/DX based card with 4MB RAM: A perfectly workable 48.2
    - The low-end Trident TVGA9000C with 512KB RAM (this is a real garbage card): A pretty shitty 14.2
    - The mid-range Cirrus Logic CL-GD-5422 with 1MB RAM (this is a decent card, know for compatibility but not necessarily speed): A barely bearable 24.7
    - And finally, the "star" of the show, the Matrox: A whopping 10.9!

    I said it was atrocious, didn't I? But hey, I'm gonna use this one with anyway, so who cares about DOS performance, right? ;)


    Montage: Close-up of the S3 card installed in the system, next to picture of the 3DBench result

    Alt...Montage: Close-up of the S3 card installed in the system, next to picture of the 3DBench result

    Montage: Picture of the Trident (a small ISA card) next to picture of the 3DBench result

    Alt...Montage: Picture of the Trident (a small ISA card) next to picture of the 3DBench result

    Montage: Picture of the Cirrus Logic (small ISA card) next to picture of the 3DBench result

    Alt...Montage: Picture of the Cirrus Logic (small ISA card) next to picture of the 3DBench result

    Montage: Picture of the Matrox (a very large full-length ISA card) next to picture of the 3DBench result

    Alt...Montage: Picture of the Matrox (a very large full-length ISA card) next to picture of the 3DBench result

      4 ★ 3 ↺

      [?]Ltning »
      @ltning@weirdr.net

      Welcome to my mini ISA VGA shootout!
      TL;DR: ISA Matrox cards are really, really slow in DOS.

      I recently built an original Pentium 60MHz system, built on an ECS motherboard. Around the same time I received a "mystery" VGA card: A Matrox MGA Impression ISA card. And since most of my builds are "open builds" and therefore easily accessible, that machine got the pleasure of becoming the test bench for the Matrox.

      As already revealed, the Matrox performs atrociously bad. So bad, in fact, that I had to test a couple other ISA cards to make sure it wasn't a system issue. I used my go-to benchmarking tool from Phil's DOS Benchmark Pack. I really don't want to experience Doom with this card..

      And without further ado, the contestants and their results in this spur-of-the-moment benchmark run:
      - Baseline: A 32-bit PCI S3 Virge/DX based card with 4MB RAM: A perfectly workable 48.2
      - The low-end Trident TVGA9000C with 512KB RAM (this is a real garbage card): A pretty shitty 14.2
      - The mid-range Cirrus Logic CL-GD-5422 with 1MB RAM (this is a decent card, know for compatibility but not necessarily speed): A barely bearable 24.7
      - And finally, the "star" of the show, the Matrox: A whopping 10.9!

      I said it was atrocious, didn't I? But hey, I'm gonna use this one with anyway, so who cares about DOS performance, right? ;)


      Montage: Close-up of the S3 card installed in the system, next to picture of the 3DBench result

      Alt...Montage: Close-up of the S3 card installed in the system, next to picture of the 3DBench result

      Montage: Picture of the Trident (a small ISA card) next to picture of the 3DBench result

      Alt...Montage: Picture of the Trident (a small ISA card) next to picture of the 3DBench result

      Montage: Picture of the Cirrus Logic (small ISA card) next to picture of the 3DBench result

      Alt...Montage: Picture of the Cirrus Logic (small ISA card) next to picture of the 3DBench result

      Montage: Picture of the Matrox (a very large full-length ISA card) next to picture of the 3DBench result

      Alt...Montage: Picture of the Matrox (a very large full-length ISA card) next to picture of the 3DBench result

        1 ★ 0 ↺

        [?]Ltning »
        @ltning@weirdr.net

        Yea sorry, I thought that was the "old" code. I was thinking EC crypto, since that's much, much faster on slow hardware. It surprised me a bit when I started experimenting, but given the much shorter keys it actually makes some sense.
        See https://git.anduin.net/ltning/sshbench - I have not tested on anything slower than a crappy 486 (because no modern BSD will work on any of them) but EC ciphers generally come out on top every time - by a huge margin, too.

          3 ★ 0 ↺

          [?]Ltning »
          @ltning@weirdr.net

          Is ssh2dos anywhere near usable these days, without running decades-old opensshd on the server end? :D

            7 ★ 2 ↺
            Pun Boleh boosted

            [?]Ltning »
            @ltning@weirdr.net

            Was wondering why my /2 installation kept crashing randomly.

            Also, testing hashtags on snac ;)

            Memtest86 5.01 reporting loads of memory errors. Yay.

            Alt...Memtest86 5.01 reporting loads of memory errors. Yay.

              4 ★ 1 ↺

              [?]Ltning »
              @ltning@weirdr.net

              player UI shootout! An AMD Am5x86 at 120MHz with a Gravis Ultrasound PnP playing back a VBR (~254Kbps) 44.1KHz MP3 file at full quality.

              The contenders: QuickView Pro version (dvpro), Digital Sound System 3.1 (dss) and MPXPlay 1.67 (mpx). The file: Astral Projection's "Bizarre Contact" from the album "Ten".

              Enjoy these clips :D


              Alt...QuickView Pro: file listing in the background and a simple status dialog in the foreground showing file information and the playback time.

              Alt...MPXPlay: File/directory browser below (mostly removed from the video), spectrum analyzer and various playback information on top.

              Alt...DSS: VU meters for left/right and playback information along with a lot of information about the file and the sound device.

              Alt...DSS: Spectrum analyzer, plus technical information as in the other video.

                2 ★ 0 ↺

                [?]Ltning »
                @ltning@weirdr.net

                Ugh. After spending three days trying to compile TUI clients for Telegram and Discord on this thing I'm giving up. The whole Rust ecosystem is just as broken and unfriendly as most everything that came before it, with upwards of 700 dependencies to build just about anything, obscure build errors and a build process that literally takes days on this - admittedly very old - hardware. It's no longer fun. :P

                3 ★ 1 ↺
                Pun Boleh boosted

                [?]Ltning »
                @ltning@weirdr.net

                In fairness, if there is such a thing which can exuse this travesty: this is an OS released in 1994, with a browser that came along in 1996, a Java version (1.1) from 1997 and a TCP/IP package from 1998 or so. Of course all this would have been easier had I been using OS/2 Warp 4, but that one is just a tad too resource hungry on this hardware. :D

                  9 ★ 4 ↺

                  [?]Ltning »
                  @ltning@weirdr.net

                  Despite all the things IBM did right with OS/2, there were some absolutely mind-boggling decisions made. Today's example: Using Java (version 1.11 or better, mind you) and a Netscape browser plug-in to install TCP/IP. Other than the chicken-and-egg-problem (which is solved by installing the transport services - NIC and protocol drivers - first), there's the fact that they had a perfectly good software installation framework which ran fine on like 6-8MB of RAM (total!). This variant swaps until my CF card starts sweating with 16MB, and is s-l-o-w!

                  I mean yeah, great, I get a proper BSD-4.4, 32-bit TCP/IP stack and tools. But it's taken me half a day. Getting the installation files over involved loading packet drivers and using in a DOS session. Which works .. surprisingly well. But still .. FixPak43, reboot. MPTS, reboot. Netscape 2.02, reboot. Java 1.18, reboot. Feature Installer plug-in (no reboot). Then, finally, TCP/IP.

                  All this to have a machine to play with at .


                    0 ★ 0 ↺

                    [?]Ltning »
                    @ltning@weirdr.net

                    Make them pay!

                      1 ★ 0 ↺

                      [?]Ltning »
                      @ltning@weirdr.net

                      http://floppy.museum/ :D (Note http, not https)

                        1 ★ 0 ↺

                        [?]Ltning »
                        @ltning@weirdr.net

                        It's fun to run servers on old, slow computers. Posts that showed up on my big fat server a couple hours ago are only showing up now, simply because it's too busy to receive all relevant notifications at once. Other instances seem to be backing off for a while, and try again at random intervals so the load on this box remains low. Pretty cool, assuming that's actually how it works!

                        Only when a post is boosted or replied to do I run the risk of my hot-babe CPU monitor turning nsfw. So better keep it boring, I guess.

                          1 ★ 1 ↺
                          Pawlicker boosted

                          [?]Ltning »
                          @ltning@weirdr.net

                          I have a server running under NetBSD on a 486, which also runs X. It's indeed painfully slow but it does work. And surprisingly well, too. An OS from 2025 on hardware from 1994.

                          And if it wasn't for crypto being too slow to actually work I'd be doing the same on the 386SX-class machine that I also have running NetBSD. But with a hyper-optimized SSH handshake taking over a minute, I have no hopes for 2k RSA signatures or any kind of TLS handshakes with remote instances happening in anywhere near the timeframe they would need to..

                            0 ★ 0 ↺

                            [?]Ltning »
                            @ltning@weirdr.net

                            I'd like to say that is an achievement no matter what your first language is ;)

                            CC: @linuxenjoyer@blahaj.zone

                              1 ★ 0 ↺

                              [?]Ltning »
                              @ltning@weirdr.net

                              Reminds me of all those times we were hiring sysadmins for our "hosting organization". And the majority of applicants came from the hospitality industry, despite our ads very clearly using words like FreeBSD and MySQL and titles like Command Line Warrior and stuff..

                                1 ★ 0 ↺

                                [?]Ltning »
                                @ltning@weirdr.net

                                My jaw literally dropped here when I read this. It's so, so familiar.

                                I don't know what your native language is, but imagine how this exact same thing feels for someone whose first language is not English .. All the same scariness plus we may not even know what the words mean! And looking them up in a dictionary leads to a whole other kind of rabbit hole, and even if you understand the definitions and use in normal human language, it does very nearly jack shit to help understand wtf it means in the programming context.

                                I know this, I've tried to learn programming since I was, what, 8? In a vacuum too, since I lived in the middle of fucking nowhere in Norway for the first 17 years of my life. Imagine only having the MS-DOS or PC-DOS handbooks and some GWBASIC code written by Bill Gates to start out with. And the vocabulary of a 8 year old kid whose grasp of the English language is limited to what he learned during 6 months of school in Australia when he was 5...

                                I'm almost creeping up on 48 now and still can't code for shit.

                                  4 ★ 3 ↺

                                  [?]Ltning »
                                  @ltning@weirdr.net

                                  I'm having the weirdest problem on this machine .. Trying to use on to profile , sometimes it works sometimes it will not actually give me any data (just print the headers). I'm using the hotuser script from the OpenDTrace toolkit.

                                  Another issue is that the only way to stop dtrace is to kill -9 it, which takes the watched process with it in the fall..

                                  Halp? :)

                                    3 ★ 1 ↺

                                    [?]Ltning »
                                    @ltning@weirdr.net

                                    It's so sad when it's over ... I envy anyone who's able to see it for the first time in this day and age.


                                      1 ★ 0 ↺

                                      [?]Ltning »
                                      @ltning@weirdr.net

                                      Larry Laffer approves this message!

                                        4 ★ 2 ↺

                                        [?]Ltning »
                                        @ltning@weirdr.net

                                        Running the hot-babe CPU monitor. [SENSITIVE CONTENT]And the obligatory screenshot .. maybe a bit nsfw due to the ancient CPU monitor ;)

                                        Since this screenshot was taken after posting the previous message, the box is quite busy, so Ms. Cynthia is a bit underdressed for the occasion..

                                        Screenshot of a NetBSD desktop showing HexChat IRC client, a couple xrootconsole instances tailing logs, WindowMaker WM, GKrellM and Hot-Babe system/CPU monitors.

                                        Alt...Screenshot of a NetBSD desktop showing HexChat IRC client, a couple xrootconsole instances tailing logs, WindowMaker WM, GKrellM and Hot-Babe system/CPU monitors.

                                          11 ★ 4 ↺
                                          Jay 🚩 :runbsd: boosted

                                          [?]Ltning »
                                          @ltning@weirdr.net

                                          I haven't obsessed this much with my desktop since I was .. much younger. Trying to make it functional and purrty on 30 year old hardware is challenging but fun. Thanks to and the fact that most old X and tools are still around and do all the things they always did - and haven't bloated much in those 30 years - helps a lot.

                                          I'll take Wayland when it comes my way without me having to lift a finger, but until then I'm glad the X Window System is still around. Keeps this old hardware useful.

                                            8 ★ 5 ↺

                                            [?]Ltning »
                                            @ltning@weirdr.net

                                            Trying to optimise http://floppy.museum for (even) older browsers. Some of the issues I'm trying to solve include utf8-to-latin1 translation (the original HTML has some silly double- and triple-byte characters), and variations of JPEG that simply aren't understood.

                                            Turns out Netscape 2.02 is too easy, so in this picture is IBM WebExplorer v1.1h running on OS/2 Warp Connect. Using the magic "work area" feature of folders (mark a folder as a work area to have the OS manage objects within it as a kind of unit), I can open several windows at once. True multi-process browsing 😉


                                            OS/2 Warp Connect with four browser windows, a text mode editor editing config.sys, the parent "work area" folder and the launch pad.

                                            Alt...OS/2 Warp Connect with four browser windows, a text mode editor editing config.sys, the parent "work area" folder and the launch pad.

                                              2 ★ 1 ↺

                                              [?]Ltning »
                                              @ltning@weirdr.net

                                              The sound of a 486SLC doing a SSH handshake.

                                              Alt...Electronic noise from the CPU/RAM while handshaking.

                                              2 ★ 0 ↺

                                              [?]Ltning »
                                              @ltning@weirdr.net

                                              Well .. that went sideways. Despite many attempts, I have yet to find a 286 - or a 386sx for that matter - that will boot the NetBSD floppies without failing in some way or other. I'm not yet certain (perhaps someone here knows?), but there may be instructions missing from the various 486SLC and 486DLC CPU variants that my ugprade modules have. Or there are other bugs that I have not been able to figure out.

                                              Anyway, I've reduced my ambitions ever so slightly, and am now in the process of installing NetBSD (-CURRENT) on what is essentially a 386SX-class machine: 16-bit bus, 24-bit addressing, 16MB RAM, and nearly as unpleasantly slow as the 286 I had planned to use. It is however equipped with an IBM-branded 486SLC, which is from the Blue Lightning series. This one definitely has a full 486 instruction set. More hardware details will follow when I've completed the build (and installation).

                                              Meanwhile, the obligatory screenshot from the installer. Note the ETA for simply unpacking base.tgz ..

                                              Screenshot from installer. Shows base.txz being extracted, at a speed of 110 KB/s. ETA given is about 30 minutes, which turned out to be relatively accurate.

                                              Alt...Screenshot from installer. Shows base.txz being extracted, at a speed of 110 KB/s. ETA given is about 30 minutes, which turned out to be relatively accurate.

                                                2 ★ 1 ↺
                                                Headbanger75 boosted

                                                [?]Ltning »
                                                @ltning@weirdr.net

                                                Herewith, the actual machine. Some specs ..
                                                - Motherboard: Zida TD60C
                                                - CPU: Harris 286 28MHz
                                                - RAM: 16MB "RainbowRAM", 55ns (check out the LEDs!)
                                                - Graphics: Cirrus Logic CL-GD5422, 1MB
                                                - Network: 3com EtherLink III (3c509)
                                                - Floppy: 2-in-1 90mm (3.5") and 1.2" floppy drive
                                                - Storage: Promise DC200M caching IDE controller, 2.5MB cache
                                                - SCSI: Sound Blaster 16 SCSI :D


                                                Dark-ish picture showing motherboard mounted horizontally on a transparent acrylic surface. Underneath a combined 5.25 inch and 90mm floppy drive. The installed RAM lights up in different colours, four sticks with blue, purpole organge and yellow LEDs, respectively. VGA, network and sound cards are also visible.

                                                Alt...Dark-ish picture showing motherboard mounted horizontally on a transparent acrylic surface. Underneath a combined 5.25 inch and 90mm floppy drive. The installed RAM lights up in different colours, four sticks with blue, purpole organge and yellow LEDs, respectively. VGA, network and sound cards are also visible.

                                                  2 ★ 0 ↺

                                                  [?]Ltning »
                                                  @ltning@weirdr.net

                                                  I had on another 286 for a while, and there's some 16-bit "port" of Linux that is not as old as it should be. And of course the venerable OS/2 1.x, and a few actual variants as you point out. I didn't know about V6on286, that's a beautiful little nugget, thank you!

                                                  All of those things are absolutely wonderful and make many of todays software developers look ... spoiled? What I want, however - and what I love doing - is making this old hardware do stuff its makers never dreamt of, things that are as far removed from their time as possible. That's why I will, if permits, run bleeding edge BSD on a 286-on-486steroids, and why I run web+ftp+irc servers (yes, multitaskign) on one 286 and multiple BBS nodes on a 386 - like one used to do, of course.

                                                  I cannot state often enough how amazing it is that there's still software developed today that will work under such constraints.


                                                    3 ★ 1 ↺

                                                    [?]Ltning »
                                                    @ltning@weirdr.net

                                                    And it lives! Apparently I'm officially operating a Motherboard Bakery! :)
                                                    Now I need to get it properly configured and tested with DOS, then I can move on to the next steps - which involve the CPU upgrade, and assuming that works, creating actual, physical floppies.

                                                    (In other news, the instance on this poor Pentium Pro server is sweating hard whenever I post something. So let me know at @ltning@anduin.net if you have problems receiving/reading my posts. I've made some tweaks but it will be unavoidably detained for a while following each post, my apologies for that..)


                                                    Picture of BIOS during boot. It's a 1990 American Megatrends BIOS, for the TD60C board, BIOS version 2.42B. It shows a 20MHz CPU clock and 15872 KB RAM tested OK.

                                                    Alt...Picture of BIOS during boot. It's a 1990 American Megatrends BIOS, for the TD60C board, BIOS version 2.42B. It shows a 20MHz CPU clock and 15872 KB RAM tested OK.

                                                      4 ★ 1 ↺

                                                      [?]Ltning »
                                                      @ltning@weirdr.net

                                                      And I know one should not apply regular water to electronics, but I'm trusting Oslo Waterworks to supply me with nice, clean water from the tap. It comes at high pressure to boot, so I can quickly get rid of all the vinegar to prevent it from slowly eating through everything. As long as I dry it properly and quickly, it should be fine, I'm told.

                                                      I said I was baking - It was not a randomly chosen term.

                                                      The mainboard is literally in the oven! 60 degrees Celcius in hot air-mode for, say, an hour or so should do, I guess.

                                                      Alt...The mainboard is literally in the oven! 60 degrees Celcius in hot air-mode for, say, an hour or so should do, I guess.

                                                        1 ★ 0 ↺

                                                        [?]Ltning »
                                                        @ltning@weirdr.net

                                                        I'm a bit of a n00b at this, but I have salvaged a couple of boards before using vinegar and a toothbrush, so I'm trying my luck with that. After applying the vinegar and watching, hearing and smelling it sizzling, I dunk the affected part thoroughly for a few minutes...

                                                        Kitchen paper dunked in 12% vinegar, placed on the affected part of the motherboard to allow the vinegar to do its magic without disappearing into thin air.

                                                        Alt...Kitchen paper dunked in 12% vinegar, placed on the affected part of the motherboard to allow the vinegar to do its magic without disappearing into thin air.